Bookends

Introduction

In a dramatic display of family fealty and mathematical incompetence, a trailer load of daughter Catherine’s belongings took control of our Jeep as Bev and I were transporting her stuff back to Maine from Pittsburgh. This was in the winter of 1991. Catherine was on her way to Brazil. We had just left the curb, Catherine’s former residence still in view, when the incline proved too steep, even at 3 miles an hour. The rig came to rest just beyond the next stop sign. We managed inch by inch to get the trailer to a box company in a nearby mall where 2500 pounds of books were offloaded and mailed home via UPS. Seventeen boxes were required! The boxes arrived a day later in a snowstorm simultaneous with us. There were still plenty of books left in the trailer to unpack. Catherine, like her parents, is a reader!

This experience came to mind recently. We’re moving from our home of forty-six years to a much smaller single story house. Catherine and Roberto, the husband to be she was visiting in Brazil at the time, are buying the old house, so those books and twenty seven additional year’s worth of purchases, along with Roberto’s library, will be on the move again. Some books from the 1991 trip are still in the attic!

More pressing for her parents, our libraries will have to be pruned drastically to fit new quarters, and the remainders transported to the public library, Goodwill, or another willing receiver. Catherine says we can leave the books for her to sort through if we like. Whatever the process, my personal library has to be reduced drastically.

The Unbearable Heaviness of Books

Books are heavy, as the Pittsburgh saga shows, and, of course, intellectually weighty. They can also be spiritually burdensome as the library reduction project proved. This realization dawned as I pruned the forty-five feet of books in my old office, a thousand pounds worth perhaps, to the two hundred and thirty jewels that survived the cut for shelving in my new office.

Here are a few of the conundrums encountered. You’ll have your own, of course, when the time comes for you to rid yourself of books. My experience probably won’t help much then, but you’ll have the consolation of knowing other sufferers preceded you.

  • I came across five Bibles, all King James versions (KJV), and one New Testament, mine when an adolescent. Two of the Bibles had been father’s, one had been mother’s, and two had been the property of grandparents. I kept one of my father’s Bibles and the New Testament. Then I put the others in attic boxes that contained my parents papers. Uneasy query: Who is supposed to find these Bibles? When? What are they supposed to do with them? Shouldn’t I have asserted family duty and forced them guiltily upon family members?
  • In my sophomore year at Bates College, circa 1956, I became a Charles Irwin Travelli Scholar. These scholarships were awarded to male students in good academic standing who played a varsity sport. Mine was basketball. A representative of the Travelli Foundation, a Mr. Davies, would come to meet with the Travelli scholars twice a year. At the fall meeting, Mr. Davies would give each of us a book he thought highly of, one that “taught character.” In the Spring, Mr. Davies would return to question us on the book. I still had two of the Travelli books in my library, Tom Dooley’s Edge of Tomorrow, and John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s Profiles in Courage. Uneasy query: I’m not planning to read these books again? What should I do with them? Are they historic artifacts now? Would the Bates College or Travelli Foundation archivists be interested? Frankly, I still feel bad that female and nonathletic classmates couldn’t get these scholarships. There weren’t then any varsity sports for women. Title 9 is the best thing that ever happened to “higher education,” right up there with the Morrill Land-Grant Acts of 1862 and 1890. I gave the books to Goodwill.
  • I found two identical high school Latin texts in my stacks. They must have been entrusted to one of my children in high school, and not returned. Which one? It’s a family tradition to blame our son Peter. Yup, I bet it was him! He was probably as bad a Latin student as I had been; I never got higher than a “D” grade! I kept one book for etymological derivations and dumped the other in a revolving library cubby hole at the Cia cafe in Millcreek village. Uneasy query: Might the high school want the books back? Could I be getting Peter in trouble? Wouldn’t the school have bought new textbooks by now? Maybe not; it’s Latin and ancient history we’re talking about.
  • When I declared myself a Sociology major at Bates College, I made the mistake of telling my father of a budding interest in criminology. At the time, he was dealing with disappointment that I wouldn’t be following him into the Christian ministry. In compensation, I’m surmising, and in an effort to demonstrate his unconditional support for his son, he made a parental mistake I’ve often repeated—the mistake of excessive enthusiasm combined with unilateral action—and proceeded to gift me three of the best known criminology textbooks on the market. One was Sutherland and Cressey’s seminal text, Principles of Criminology. My interest in criminology faded in time, possibly within a fortnight, and I was stuck with the three hefty tomes for decades. I finally got up the gumption to dump two of the books in 1997 when I retired from the University of Southern Maine. In November of this year I donated the Sutherland and Cressey text to a book sale at the public library. Uneasy query: Shouldn’t I have kept the Cressey Sutherland text out of respect for and gratitude to my father? Have I committed a symbolic patricide? a “partial” suicide? a diminishment of self?
  • In the fall of 1960, in Harold Pfautz’s seminar on Social Psychology at Brown University, while pursuing a PhD program in Sociology, I lost my way in a paper I was writing on the subject of “vocabularies of motives,” as rendered in Chapter 5, Section 2, of Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills’ text, Character and Social Structure. Basically, the problem was writers block. I had six excellent pages in hand from which others should flow, but they wouldn’t; big contradiction instead; no resolution. So I would read the chapter and six pages again, make a fresh start, fail again, rest up, and do it all over again, ad infinitum, ad nauseam. I never resolved the problem, and ended up settling for a gentleman’s “B” through Professor Pfautz’s generosity. I never have figured out what went wrong. Well, there the book sits still. What to do? I’ll Keep it! It’s among the 230 jewels that went to the new house. Uneasy query: But why did I keep it? For a possible blog essay perhaps? I hate the idea of an unresolved problem. Therefore, I promised myself to read it again! It’s the only time I suffered writers block! Yea, but that was 68 years ago! And, will I actually do it?

Denouement

As these conundrums suggest, the library reduction project turned burdensome. There were highs, of course. The decision to keep books written by former students felt fitting. These included Julius Rubin’s Religious Melancholy and Protestant Experience in America (1994), The Other Side of Joy (2000), and Tears of Repentance (2013), Carole Starr’s To Root and To Rise: Accepting Brain Injury (2017), and Laurie McCammon’s Enough: How to Liberate Yourself and Remake the World With Just One Word (2016). Starr’s book is the best book I know of for sufferers of brain injury. McCammon’s book presents a world of spiritual abundance sufficient to nurture a just society and a productive, communal, and joyous life.

Setting aside the happy choices, slashing a library can be devastating, and is for that reason a fools errand. Ridding oneself of a book, carried out in the wrong spirit, is self-destructive. For example, giving away José Ortega y Gasset’s books felt sad; I had long depended on him for, among other things, an understanding of how generational change works over time, and now, if I looked on the matter that way, I would be reducing myself to a dead past and lonely memory. “I won’t be reading this/these text/texts ever again!” Did I really want to assert that?

The answer is “no!” Why choose spiritual devastation? Likewise, forcing myself to reread the Gerth and Mills book is soul killing foolishness too. On what spiritual grounds would I want to predetermine and foreshorten an ever shrinking future?

The foolishness became evident, and hilarious too, when the preciously preserved 230 survivors—absent such luminaries as Ortega Y Gasset, Lucretius, and Aristotle, was supplemented by loving gift givers. I received six new books in December for my birthday and Christmas. Are these books to be compared with the survivors? Are they to be judged less worthy in comparison with the ones recently sacrificed? No. Don’t even go there. Don’t ask! Love the giver? Receive the gift. Read the book! “Your life is now!”

While my library had meant the world to me, It had to be pruned to fit reduced spaces and curtailed lives. But “our” library, the grand library of humankind, isn’t gone. It grows. It thrives. If book burnings such as the one that devastated the ancient Library at Alexandria can be avoided, the grand library of humankind will flourish, teach, nourish, and sustain humankind indefinitely. In all honesty, I can get any book I want or need in about two days time and probably with free shipping! The human library isn’t the issue. How I value my remaining humanity is.

I conclude with a memory of a young Julius Rubin, the sociologist whose books I noted and kept. He was at that time a sophomore at Clark University and I was a professor. A precocious student, Julius did me the great honor of inviting himself to be my student assistant and guide in the teaching of Sociology 100. On one bright day, early in our collaboration, he declared with passion and finality that books are to be read and then—rat-tat-tat—given away! So we tried that out. He gave me a book and I did likewise for him, and then, after reading, we passed them on to others. This was in 1967 or 68, in revolutionary times! Julius had it right. Who needs a library when there are so many books to read and give away? I still own a few hundred books, including six new ones. I will read them and gladly pass them on. Let me know if you want one. You’re welcome to any of them!

Will Callender, Jr. ©

January 8, 2019

Author of Abdication: God Steps Down for Good

3 thoughts on “Bookends

Add yours

  1. I loved this Will. Even though we have downsized we are still collecting books that Jim wants me to give away. I hold them close to me for awhile and then slowly give in. Audrey

    1. A number of the messages I’ve received on “Bookends” gave examples of how close people hold books to their hearts. Books are existential objects! I may do a follow-up essay on this theme. Thanks so much. Love to you both, Will

  2. Yes, much to be said on the topic. I haven’t been able to locate one of my favorites, Sociobiology, by E.O. Wilson. I refuse to buy another. From a practical point of view, I am intrigued by my highlighting of fifty years ago and more recently. Jim

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

A WordPress.com Website.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: